Skip to Content

Is 1% of an Ethnicity Region Always Just Noise?

Did you get 1% of an unexpected region in your DNA results? Maybe your ethnicity estimate shows 1% Irish, 1% European Jewish, 1% Bantu, or 1% North African DNA. You might be tempted to brush off these “trace” amounts of DNA from a particular region as statistical noise, but should you?

Is 1% of an Ethnicity Region Always Just Noise_

In this post, I am going to explain to you why and how I believe that you should thoroughly investigate every region on your ethnicity estimate or ancestry composition report in order to learn as much as you can about your ancestors.

In short, don’t ignore your 2%, 1% or even less than 1% regions and disregard them as noise.

If tracking down the ancestor that might have contributed a very small amount of an ethnicity region to you seems daunting, don’t worry! You can follow the tips that I suggest to learn from whom you may have inherited your trace ethnicities, too.

As an example, I am also going to show you the steps I took to determine which ancestral line contributed my dad’s North African and Arabian ancestry which showed up as a minuscule .3% on his 23andMe results.

Click here to buy the Understand Your DNA Results Ebook

Is your 1% DNA region plausible?

History never ceases to surprise me. For example, I’ve been working on tracking down my mom’s 1% Southeastern Bantu ancestry. All of her lines on her Bantu side of the family, as far as I’ve traced, go to England, Ireland, and Scotland.

Initially, I was tempted to write her 1% Southeastern Bantu ancestry off as noise, but then I learned that many thousands of enslaved individuals were taken from Africa to the British Isles.

I had been thinking about her ancestry from an American-centric point of view, and assumed that she must have been descended from an enslaved person brought to North America.

Now that I understand that she could have inherited her Bantu ancestry from one of her English, Irish, or Scottish ancestors, I can expand my search – and hopefully, discover the identity of my Bantu ancestor.

Have you built a family tree?

I’m going to address the elephant in the room. How can we have a serious discussion about whether or not a 1% (or 5%, for that matter) region in our ethnicity results is noise – or not – unless we’ve begun the important work of trying to determine where many of our ancestors came from.

In other words, how can we know what is plausible – or even possible – when we don’t have a thorough knowledge of our family tree?

Yes, most of us know that Grandpa was born in Philadelphia, and Grandma’s parents were Scottish, and Dad’s parents were from Germany and Nigeria. Based on this cursory knowledge of our ancestry, we would be surprised to find 1% Native American, or 2% European Jewish in our results.

Generally speaking, we all have:

  • 4 grandparents
  • 8 great-grandparents
  • 16 great-great grandparents
  • 32 great-great-great grandparents
  • 64 great-great-great grandparents
  • 128 great-great-great-great grandparents

Based on our understanding of DNA inheritance, we know that we inherited DNA from most of our great-great-great-great grandparents.

Do you know who all 128 of your great-great-great-great grandparents were, where they were born, and where their families came from?

I recommend building trees on Ancestry. It’s free to start and keep a tree, you can connect it to your DNA results, and it’s very easy to use. I’m a huge fan of Ancestry’s tree building site.

Have you gotten a second opinion about your trace ethnicity region?

When my dad first did his Ancestry DNA test, he received 1% North Africa on his results. Based on what I knew of my dad’s family tree, I was surprised to see this region on his ethnicity estimate.

One of the first things that I did with my dad’s DNA was upload it to Gedmatch. On this site, they have a number of admixture calculators that were designed by various researchers.

Each calculator has a different focus, so it’s helpful to play around with them to see what you find.

For example, I ran my dad’s DNA through the MDLP K16 calculator on Gedmatch, and the generalized proportions matched very well to what he was seeing on his Ancestry DNA results. Plus, there was a small percentage of North African reported (.48%).

For several reasons, including wanting to know more about this small percentage of possibly North African ancestry, I asked him if he would be willing to take a DNA test with 23andMe.

Check this out:

So yes, it’s a super small percentage and indicates very distant North African ancestry. But I like a challenge. During the rest of this post, I’ll tell you a few things that I did to help me determine which two out of 128 great-great-great-great grandparents likely passed this down to my dad.

DNA matches are key to researching trace ethnicity regions

If you are serious about genealogy and DNA testing, I recommend learning about chromosome mapping. A really cool website called “DNA Painter” makes it simple to do, so don’t worry.

Our DNA matches share DNA segments with us that were inherited from our common ancestors. Many DNA testing companies, as well as Gedmatch, allow access to something called a “chromosome browser“, which shows us the exact location on our chromosomes where our shared DNA segments with our matches are located.

There are lots of ways to keep track of this “segment data”, as I call it. DNA Painter is my favorite way. It is quick and easy, and is a simple way to visualize where our DNA matches fall on our chromosomes.

I’ve only “painted” about 26% of my dad’s DNA (as shown in the image below), but I’ve painted in enough DNA matches (by pasting in the segment data from the chromosome browsers) to start to get a feeling about which ancestors may have passed down a particular ethnicity.

If I click on a chromosome, I will be able to see the names of the DNA matches that match me on the segments you can see painted below.

The “real” magic happens next.

23andMe allows you to download segment data pertaining to ancestry regions

23andMe allows you to download detailed segment data revealing which DNA segments (from your DNA matches) on which chromosomes correspond with the reported ancestry region. In just a few easy steps, you can paste this data into your DNA Painter profile.

The ethnicity/ancestry segments will show up just like a segment from a DNA match.

In the case of tracing a “trace” ethnicity region, what we would look for is a DNA segment shared with a match that overlaps with the ethnicity region in question.

My dad’s North African DNA segment is on Chromosome 12, and happens to overlap with a segment shared with his match named “Beta”. I know which ancestors my dad shares with Beta, and so I now know which ancestors possibly passed down the North African DNA to my dad.

Take a look at the segment data for Chromosome 12 that I have painted in for my dad on DNA Painter:

It’s probably worth testing with 23andMe only to get access to this ethnicity data, especially if there is a region that you are very curious about. After learning how helpful this segment data is, I have had several other family members test in order to narrow down my various searches even more.

The next step? Learning more about the ancestors that my dad shares with Beta! I’ve traced those lines back quite a ways, but there are a few places where I have gotten stuck.

Maybe I should focus more on those ancestors to see which secrets they will reveal to me?

Okay, trace regions are sometimes noise

It’s important to acknowledge that ethnicity estimates are a new technology, and although companies put a lot of resources into giving us accurate results, it’s possible that small regions (or even larger regions) are inaccurate.

But it’s WAY more fun to jump headfirst into this research and see where it takes you. And that’s why I always suggest that we follow the DNA, leaving no chromosome or DNA segment un-turned 🙂

Is 1% of an Ethnicity Region Always Just Noise?  Pinterest image with a colored pie chart with two segments highlighted

Conclusion

I hope that this post helped you learn why it is important that you research and learn about all of the branches of your family tree. Even a small amount of a particular ethnicity region can be a clue to a very exciting part of your family story.

If you have any questions about something that you read in this post, or if you would like to add your experience tracking down your trace ethnicity regions, I would love to hear from you in the discussion below.

Thanks for being here today!

Share the knowledge!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Loretta Irene Henry

Friday 12th of November 2021

Thank you for this info, it speaks to a similar point of bewilderment. My entire recent family is from the English speaking Caribbean, so using Ancestry, seeing 3% England was far from a surprise but the 1% Eastern Europe and Russia -aka stated as 1.7% Central Asian (the "astans") on My Heritage threw me for a loop! Furthermore, with pages and pages of matches, so far the ONLY one I see sharing this percentage is my late dad's first cousin which would sync with the most likely line this would have come from. Ancestry also generated 9% Cameroon, Congo and Western Bantu but My Heritage somehow named it 11.7% Kenyan, which also was surprising cause I'd never seen it on Ancestry. I understand some regions that are adjacent to one another can cause this discrepancy in description but it's confusing to me and due to "colonialism" in the Caribbean, I think solving these mysteries will be all the more challenging - any thoughts (meaning can I hire you to do it for me, LOL?)

Didi S. Gilson

Sunday 15th of August 2021

Hi Mercedes: Enjoying your blog, but I think you left out a couple of instances of the word Great in one of your charts. The last two lines (so 64 and 128 Great GPs both need an additional Great -- because they are, LOL):

"32 great-great-great grandparents 64 great-great-great grandparents 128 great-great-great-great grandparents"

Mercedes

Sunday 15th of August 2021

Thank you so much for noticing that! I always appreciate the extra eyes to spot mistakes :)

Ronald Douglas

Saturday 31st of October 2020

I have tested with four companies over about 5 years. When I received my results from 23andMe, it showed .3% NA (only one of the four to report NA). Later, my 1st cousin (male, maternal side) advised his 23andMe also showed NA at .1%, and my son's test showed .2%. In our family, there has been a long and strong tradition that we were descended from Pocahontas (!) which I had never believed possible until we all got our NA results. I believe this likely comes from my maternal grandmother's paternal grandparents' side but haven't been able to go much deeper than that. I have a reasonably well-developed tree on Ancestry but haven't been able to punch through this brick wall. I have a theory of a possible link to a family that links to Pocahontas but that's about it. I not a young man and would like to solve this mystery, if possible, for my children and grandchildren before I leave the planet! Any advise/thoughts would be appreciated. (My other tests were with Ancestry, LivingDNA and CRI Genetics. I've also uploaded my results with FTDNA). I don't believe my link is via my mtDNA line but I guess it might be possible; my Mom's haplogroup is H5a. Thanks for any help!

Lori Smith

Sunday 9th of February 2020

In 2015 I did my dna on Ancestry and was disappointed none of my Native American ancestry showed up. I'd been told my entire life we were part Native from my mom's side. I knew it was there. Then in 2016 I did my great aunt on my mom's side and she came back 3% Native. There it was! In 2019 my brother did his dna on Ancestry and he came back less than 1% Native. He had enough that Ancestry caught it. I also had done my dna on 23andme and I came back .1% Native (one-tenth of one percent). It also stated my Native ancestor would have lived between 1680-1730. On Gedmatch my ancient dna came back with 'noise' amounts of Native Ancestry on some, but not all of their tests (Eurogenes, MDLP, etc). But on the Chromosome Painting on Gedmatch my Native ancestry showed up consistently, especially on my first chromosome. I knew it had to be there (this was before I had done 23andme or my great aunt's dna). So I knew it was there- and when I did 23andme my Native dna came back on my 1 chromosome. Just exactly where I had found it distinctly on Gedmatch, I had given up on finding my Native ancestor. What were the chances of finding this link in so long ago records, especially when so many people used to hide this ancestry because of racism. Originally, we'd been told our Native ancestor came from my paternal grandfather as he always claimed to be Native and said his Native ancestry went back to the Mingo Indians. IF he had this ancestry, it has not shown up in any of us. It would have had to have been further back if it were true. So all of my life I assumed I was part Mingo and now I find my Native roots came from his wife, my maternal grandmother. Then within the past month while digging for genealogy and going through trees and information following leaves on Ancestry, I decided to work on my mother's maternal line and was cleaning up some of my sites on Wikitree when I found something so interesting I could not believe it. I found my Native ancestor! Her name was "Ann" (anglicized) and her parents were Choctaw! Not even close to what I was expecting! Her father was born around 1700 and she was born in 1730. She married a white man. And she and her father was in the exact timeline given to me by 23andme. I need to do some more digging to make sure this is correct, but I am pretty sure it is. I never expected to find my Native ancestor and definitely did not expect that person to be Choctaw! Not even close. I was expecting Mingo or Shawnee. So, yes, that 'noise' is not always noise- even when in infinitesimal amounts like one-tenth of one percent. Keep digging! Keep researching! Now, if I can only break down so many of the other 'brick walls" that I have!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.