Is DNA testing to learn about ancestors a substitute for traditional genealogy research? Here, find out the answer to this question – and more.
DNA is one of the most amazing tools for those interested in their family trees and genealogy. DNA can prove many things beyond a shadow of the doubt, but it does have some limitations.
These limitations are visible both in the ethnicity estimate and DNA match list, and are important to understand, especially when it comes to using autosomal DNA to prove family relationships.
In this post, you’ll learn why you’ll still need to do more traditional family tree research, even if you took a DNA test.
Ethnicity estimates don’t tell you much about your family history
Most people get started with DNA testing because they are interested in their ethnicity estimate. Ethnicity estimates are really fun and can often reveal something previously unknown about our family’s ancestry.
When it comes to building a family tree or understanding details about our roots, however, ethnicity estimates are only general tools that can point us in the direction of where our ancestors may have lived.
The reason that ethnicity estimates can’t provide details about our ancestry is because we don’t share DNA with all of our ancestors. Each child inherits 50% of their DNA from their parents, meaning that some DNA is “lost” each generation.
Our genomes aren’t big enough to hold DNA from all of our ancestors anyway, so it’s a good thing that some of it is left behind each generation. (It’s not such a good thing for genealogy, though!)
The end result is that our ethnicity estimates only show results for the DNA that we do share with our ancestors. Our results will not always match our family tree.
Much more valuable to family tree research is our DNA match list. Our DNA matches can provide us with information about who our genetic relatives are, where they live, and what their family tree looks like.
Using this information can help us build our family trees and get a very detailed understanding about our recent and distant ancestry. Even DNA match lists have limitations, though.
DNA can tell you very close relationships with no additional research
The amount of DNA shared by a parent, child, or a full sibling is so high that a simple autosomal DNA test can tell you how two people are related without much guessing. In fact, parents, children, and full siblings generally appear on our DNA match list as such, since the DNA testing companies can usually determine these relationships automatically.
Even though the DNA match list can tell us for sure about the relatives mentioned above, most of our DNA matches are not going to fall within the above categories. We only have two biological parents, after all, and most of us know who are siblings and children are.
More distant relatives require DNA information and genealogy research
For slightly more more distant relationships, things get a bit trickier. For example, we can share the same amount of DNA with a half-sibling as we can with an aunt or uncle, and first cousins can share DNA in the range overlapping with that of a grand-uncle.
In order to be sure about a relationship, you need to have more tools in your toolbox. To determine exactly how we are related to a match, we must have more information.
Let’s take one of my cousins, for example. I learned about him when I started learning about my family tree – I had not met him or communicated with him previously.
He shows up on my DNA list as a 4th-6th cousin match. Many people might think that this relationship is too far away to be helpful or even that it would be impossible to figure out the relationship.
Fortunately, this cousin is an expert level genealogy researcher. So when we got in touch, he was able to explain to me exactly who he was and how we were related.
His great-grandfather is my great-great grandfather. The reason that the DNA test showed such a small relationship is because his great-grandmother is not my great-grandmother, meaning that we only share one common ancestor at that level, and not two.
It turns out that his great-grandmother died after childbirth, which is a tragedy that was historically more common, even though it still occurs today. His great-grandfather remarried and had my great-grandfather.
Amount of Shared DNA can’t tell us for sure how we are related
Centimorgans are important for determining relationships, but they don’t tell the whole story. We should only use the amount of DNA that we share with a relative to determine a list of potential relationships, but we still have to use genealogical information to figure out exactly how we are related to our relative.
In technical terms, the cousin that I mentioned above and I are second-cousins once-removed. He and my mother are second cousins.
However, the amount of DNA that we share is 50% less than it would be, on average, because of his great-grandmother being a different person than my great-great grandmother. We are half cousins and share 49 centimorgans (cMs) of DNA.
The average shared for this relationship distance is 81 cMs, and it can be as high as around 200 cMs. My mother shares 70 cMs with him (her second cousin).
A second cousin could share as high as 500 cMs (though the average is closer to 200 cMs). The low number in shared DNA is because of the “half” relationship a few generations back, which resulted in less shared DNA and Ancestry’s software thinking that our relationship was more distant.
My grandmother’s family got split up when she was young, so my mother didn’t get a chance to know first and second cousins in her family. Otherwise, this new cousin for me might have been someone that I would have known of, or even known personally, while I was growing up.
It’s a good thing that he had already gotten a head start on the family tree the old-fashioned way before the advent of DNA testing, or I might have foolishly ignored this cousin match and missed out on a very wonderful family relationship with my second cousin.
Have you done a DNA test yet?
Even though DNA can’t instantly solve many of your family’s mysteries (though it can solve plenty!), your search for your heritage will benefit greatly from DNA testing.
I recommend testing with Ancestry DNA, 23andMe, Living DNA and/or Family Tree DNA. You can purchase your DNA tests via the links below.
You can order a DNA test using any of the links below. I may receive a very small commission that helps me support this site, and it is at no extra cost to you, so thank you!
Conclusion
I hope this post gave you some explanation as to why you might still have to build a family tree even if you took a DNA test. Have you noticed anything that DNA was not able to help you with? How have you used DNA in your own family research? Answer in the comments!
Thanks for stopping by today.
Gerald Berwick
Saturday 29th of July 2023
My maternal grandmother was said to be 100% Italian heritage. My wife had me do a DNA test through Ancestry. The first results showed pretty much what I would have expected, from what I was told by family members about where our ancestors came from. English, Scottish, German, Portuguese, Italian and small % North African (Miroco?). Since those results they now show no Italian at all, and other nationalities changed or have been eliminated. My maternal cousins had similar results.